The Evolution of Party Systems between Elections
نویسنده
چکیده
Most existing theoretical work on party competition pays little attention to the evolution of party systems between elections as a result of defections between parties. In this article, we treat individual legislators as utility-maximizing agents tempted to defect to other parties if this would increase their expected payoffs. We model the evolution of party systems between elections in these terms and discuss this analytically, exploring unanswered questions using computational methods. Under office-seeking motivational assumptions, our results strikingly highlight the role of the largest party, especially when it is “dominant” in the technical sense, as a pole of attraction in interelectoral evolution.
منابع مشابه
The Challenges of the Elections Systems of Persian Gulf Arab Countries
This article intends to clarify views regarding important challenges that have originated from the political, social, cultural and geopolitical structures in the elections systems of Persian Gulf Arab countries. Challenges that determine the compatibility levels of elections systems of these countries with the world’s democratic systems. An efficient elections system is the prerequisite for the...
متن کاملCritical analysis of the President's Authorization in the Turkish's 2017 Constitution
From the time that it took political authority in Turkey, the AKP constantly raised the issue of changing Turkey's political system from the parliamentary to the presidential system. Under Erdogan's leadership, after the coup in April 15, 2016, the party was able to reach its goal thanks to the political support of parties and social accompaniment through 2017's referendum. The purpose of this ...
متن کاملVoting for Parties or for Candidates: Do Electoral Institutions Make a Difference?
Little is known about how electoral institutions systematically affect the level of incumbency advantage in legislative elections. In this paper, I analyze the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (CSES) data to put the U.S. case in a comparative context and explore how electoral institutions aid or preclude incumbents from gaining an advantage. In particular, I study whether electoral system...
متن کاملحزب عدالت و توسعه: شکافهای اجتماعی و میانجیگری سیاسی
Parties as one of the most important social forces shaped by social Cleavages and seek to manage them. Less society can be found that has not social divide. In Turkey, as a legacy of a plural society, there are several social Cleavage are generally active. Purpose of this research is addressing the AKP experience in managing social Cleavage by examining the historical process is the formation o...
متن کاملParty registration choices as a function of the geographic distribution of partisanship: a model of ‘hidden partisanship’ and an illustrative test
The Public Choice literature has identified conditions in which voters in multi-candidate contests would have an incentive to vote strategically rather than vote for the most preferred candidate or candidates. In the US, where party registration and party primaries play a critical role in the electoral process—especially in states with closed primaries—the existence of multiple layers of electi...
متن کامل